🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actress has joined the growing list of performers who voice skepticism about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she chose not to use their services while filming her new movie her upcoming film.

Understanding the Purpose of On-Set Intimacy Professionals

Intimacy coordinators emerged following the #MeToo movement to guarantee the safety and comfort of actors during scenes involving partial undress and intimate moments. Yet, several well-known actors including Gwyneth Paltrow and Sean Bean have expressed reservations about their presence, with some suggesting they interfere with creative flow.

Lawrence's Personal Experience

In conversation on the popular culture podcast, while discussing her latest project where she portrays a character descending into mental health challenges, the actress commented: "We did not have such a professional, or perhaps we did have one but didn't make use of their services... I felt entirely secure with Rob."

She continued: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to his partner. Our conversations primarily focused on family life and relationships. There was absolutely no uncomfortable moments or doubts about professional limits."

"Had there been even a hint of discomfort, I would have requested an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors take offense if you aren't interested in their advances, and then the retaliation starts. Rob was completely different."

Professional Validation and Ongoing Debate

Recently, industry platform IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a distinct credit, alongside eleven other crew positions including dance direction, craft services, and puppet operation. Previously, they were categorized as "additional crew" rather than having their own designation.

Notwithstanding this validation, these professionals continue to face public discussion implying they might not be required standards, with well-known performers rejecting their participation. Jennifer's viewpoint echoes that of Jennifer Aniston, who previously revealed she declined intimacy coordination while working with Jon Hamm on their television series.

Aniston's Experience

"He proved to be such a gentleman – truly each action, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "It was additionally very choreographed. That's the benefit of working with talented directors, suitable lighting. So, minimal preparation is needed."

She added, "Production suggested, 'Professional verification if you're comfortable,' and I thought, 'Please, this is sufficiently uncomfortable!' We're experienced professionals – we can manage appropriately. And we had our director on set."

Other Examples and Professional Response

Despite featuring multiple sequences of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning project about a sex worker and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an on-set professional.

The film's star stated she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "decided it would be preferable to maintain privacy."

"My character is a professional in adult entertainment, and I had researched the director's work and understood his dedication to realism. I was professionally ready for it. As an actress, I approached it as part of my job."

These statements generated significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the response to Gwyneth Paltrow's public statements, who earlier this year shared that working on her forthcoming project Marty Supreme represented her first encounter with the relatively new profession, which she "was unaware of previously."

Paltrow's Perspective

During filming about personal ease with a specific move alongside co-star her younger counterpart, Paltrow responded: "I belong to the generation where you remove clothing, you get in bed, the camera's on."

She continued that she and Chalamet then told the professional: "We think we're comfortable. You can step back.' I can't speak to how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an creative professional, very stifled by that."

Industry Response

After these statements, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick labeled them "concerning" and pointed out that the majority of those speaking against intimacy coordinators have established careers to maintain personal authority and security on film sets.

"Occasionally an performer shares opinions about whether they appreciate on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "Gwyneth Paltrow stated she came of age in a period when industry professionals 'removed clothing and got on with it'. As a powerful woman in Hollywood performing alongside a actor much younger than her, although likely he is chill, I found it quite an irresponsible statement."

Male Perspective

Michael Douglas, in contrast, shared that he feels the main obligation during heterosexual sex scenes falls on the male performer, instead of a third party.

"Based on my career, you assume duty as the male actor to ensure the woman is comfortable, you discuss it completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to touch you here if that's acceptable'. It's very deliberate but seems like it's happening naturally, which is ideally what convincing acting appears as."